Actual socio-humanitarian problems of strengthening the subjectness of the Russian Federation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21146/2713-1483-2023-5-1-28-46Keywords:
subjectness, reflexion, post-non-classical scientific rationality, self-developing poly-subject environments, third-order cybernetics, subjectness security.Abstract
In the context of the growing conflict with the “collective West”, it is necessary to create adequate mechanisms for governing the country, focused on consolidating the state, society and business, on strengthening its subjectness to ensure life and development. Philosophical foundations are proposed to justify the increase in the role of subjectness and the basic characteristics of subjectness are considered. The analysis of the current state of Russia’s subjectness allows us to conclude that it has a poorly organized subjectness, which has been formed over the past thirty years of the cult of money and admiration for the “collective West”. The centuries-old history of Russia gives grounds for the assertion that it has a civilizational code that saves it in situations that threaten the loss of sovereignty. Conventionally, this code can be called the code of “mobilization subjectness”. The topical socio-humanitarian problems of strengthening the subjectness of Russia are considered, among which an important place is occupied by the problem of improving the mechanisms of public participation at all levels from local to federal. The expediency of forming a new direction in ensuring the security of social systems – “subjectness security” is substantiated. The basic philosophical and methodological foundations of this work are related to post-non-classical scientific rationality and post-non-classical cybernetics of self-developing poly-subject (reflexive-active) environments – third-order cybernetics. In the context of the problem of subjectness, this approach allows, when assembling subjects, to rely on the harmony of hierarchies, networks and environments, creating conditions for their convergence, and not opposition. The basis for these processes is a system of ontologies of self-developing poly-subject (reflexive-active) environments, which allows overcoming the limitations of the network approach (non-classical scientific rationality) and proceeding to the formation of an integral macrosubject.